How personal responsibility arguments help industries avoid regulation: Lessons from Big Tobacco and Big Food

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Tobacco control shines as a beacon of success in public health -- one that has informed advocates from many fields in their efforts to protect the public from harmful products. But just as advocates have learned from tobacco control, major industries have learned from the tobacco industry itself. The food and beverage industry's opposition to recent regulatory efforts, for example, has gotten a lot of attention for resembling the counter-regulatory "playbook" established by the tobacco industry to fight tobacco control policies.

What does this playbook look like and how do Big Food and Big Tobacco's tactics compare? At this year's meeting of the American Public Health Association, we'll dig into these questions and share findings from a content analysis we did of media coverage of both industries.

We started by exploring media coverage of the tobacco industry from 1966 to 1991. We also analyzed news coverage of the food and beverage industry from 2000 to 2011, when obesity emerged as a public health concern. We found that both Big Tobacco and Big Food have shifted responsibility away from themselves and their harmful products by drawing on the deeply held American value of individual responsibility. However, their strategies for doing so differ. Unlike tobacco companies, which placed blame for smoking-related diseases explicitly on consumers, food and beverage representatives primarily have used the news to deflect responsibility by creating costly "corporate social responsibility" campaigns and claiming to be "part of the solution" to nutrition-related diseases.

Our work offers advocates from both tobacco control and obesity prevention a more complete understanding of how two industries use the news to forestall regulation across shifting political landscapes. In addition, our analysis suggests that as the food and beverage industry uses the media to bolster its image, public health advocates must focus their efforts on undermining these self-promoting arguments to change the public's perception not only about harmful foods and beverages themselves, but also about the companies that produce and market them.

Please join us at session 43810 (Getting the message across: Manipulation or education?) on Tuesday, Nov. 5 at 4:30 p.m. to learn more!


Gardasil (1) sandusky (2) health equity (10) Let's Move (1) prison phone calls (1) target marketing (9) physical activity (1) Measure O (1) suicide barrier (2) junk food marketing (4) sexism (2) child sexual abuse (5) Aurora (1) snap (1) Citizens United (1) personal responsibility (3) government intrusion (1) news coverage (1) youth (1) news (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) cigarette advertising (1) Nickelodeon (1) nanny state (2) cervical cancer (1) SB-5 (1) Proposition 47 (1) weight of the nation (1) Black Lives Matter (1) soda warning labels (1) vaccines (1) food industry (4) Richmond (5) Big Tobacco (3) world water day (1) front groups (1) racism (1) ACEs (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) white house (1) Dora the Explorer (1) HPV vaccine (1) violence prevention (8) mental health (2) strategic communication (1) El Monte (3) gun control (2) community violence (1) news monitoring (1) alcohol (5) beauty products (1) privilege (1) suicide nets (1) violence (2) choice (1) Wendy Davis (1) media advocacy (23) authentic voices (1) Tea Party (1) childhood trauma (3) Big Food (2) structural racism (1) Whiteclay (4) SB 1000 (1) diabetes prevention (1) Amanda Fallin (1) social change (1) media analysis (6) chronic disease (2) paula deen (1) women's health (2) new year's resolutions (1) measure N (2) Marion Nestle (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Happy Meals (1) digital marketing (3) childhood lead poisoning (1) stigma (1) auto safety (1) reproductive justice (1) sexual health (1) Joe Paterno (1) tobacco industry (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) prison system (1) social justice (2) public health data (1) childhood obesity (1) collaboration (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) liana winett (1) cancer prevention (1) soda industry (4) food swamps (1) McDonald's (1) ssb (1) cap the tap (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) summer camps (1) Michelle Obama (1) sugary drinks (10) paper tigers (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) elephant triggers (1) Sandy Hook (2) journalism (1) product safety (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) community (1) naacp (1) social media (2) institutional accountability (1) soda taxes (2) Connecticut shooting (1) indoor smoking ban (1) abortion (1) campaign finance (1) community organizing (1) community health (1) Telluride (1) suicide prevention (2) genital warts (1) American Beverage Association (1) Chile (1) news strategy (1) gender (1) communication (2) food environment (1) junk food (2) messaging (3) Big Soda (2) equity (3) safety (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) tobacco tax (1) marketing (1) default frame (1) values (1) community safety (1) Proposition 29 (1) Bill Cosby (1) cannes lions festival (1) San Francisco (3) nonprofit communications (1) cosmetics (1) sexual violence (2) Colorado (1) FCC (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Catholic church (1) food deserts (1) healthy eating (1) food justice (1) food and beverage marketing (3) race (1) PepsiCo (1) SB 402 (1) Texas (1) prevention (1) breastfeeding (3) george lakoff (1) online marketing (1) obesity (10) news analysis (3) Coca-Cola (3) advocacy (3) language (6) democracy (1) framing (14) emergency contraception (1) sexual assault (1) apha (3) industry appeals to choice (1) beverage industry (2) Twitter (1) communication strategy (1) public health (71) health care (1) Bloomberg (3) media bites (1) election 2016 (1) filibuster (1) political correctness (1) gun violence (1) public health policy (2) Sam Kass (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food access (1) regulation (2) childhood adversity (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) autism (1) social math (1) diabetes (1) obesity prevention (1) inequities (1) soda (12) sports drinks (1) children's health (3) sanitation (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) water security (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Donald Trump (2) SSBs (1) Berkeley (2) Rachel Grana (1) Merck (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) water (1) built environment (2) Penn State (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Newtown (1) tobacco control (2) environmental health (1) food marketing (5) cancer research (1) soda tax (11) tobacco (5) seat belt laws (1) california (1) media (7) food (1) education (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: