How personal responsibility arguments help industries avoid regulation: Lessons from Big Tobacco and Big Food

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Tobacco control shines as a beacon of success in public health -- one that has informed advocates from many fields in their efforts to protect the public from harmful products. But just as advocates have learned from tobacco control, major industries have learned from the tobacco industry itself. The food and beverage industry's opposition to recent regulatory efforts, for example, has gotten a lot of attention for resembling the counter-regulatory "playbook" established by the tobacco industry to fight tobacco control policies.

What does this playbook look like and how do Big Food and Big Tobacco's tactics compare? At this year's meeting of the American Public Health Association, we'll dig into these questions and share findings from a content analysis we did of media coverage of both industries.

We started by exploring media coverage of the tobacco industry from 1966 to 1991. We also analyzed news coverage of the food and beverage industry from 2000 to 2011, when obesity emerged as a public health concern. We found that both Big Tobacco and Big Food have shifted responsibility away from themselves and their harmful products by drawing on the deeply held American value of individual responsibility. However, their strategies for doing so differ. Unlike tobacco companies, which placed blame for smoking-related diseases explicitly on consumers, food and beverage representatives primarily have used the news to deflect responsibility by creating costly "corporate social responsibility" campaigns and claiming to be "part of the solution" to nutrition-related diseases.

Our work offers advocates from both tobacco control and obesity prevention a more complete understanding of how two industries use the news to forestall regulation across shifting political landscapes. In addition, our analysis suggests that as the food and beverage industry uses the media to bolster its image, public health advocates must focus their efforts on undermining these self-promoting arguments to change the public's perception not only about harmful foods and beverages themselves, but also about the companies that produce and market them.

Please join us at session 43810 (Getting the message across: Manipulation or education?) on Tuesday, Nov. 5 at 4:30 p.m. to learn more!


marketing (1) emergency contraception (1) messaging (3) Coca-Cola (3) beauty products (1) framing (14) language (6) tobacco control (2) Twitter (1) food and beverage marketing (3) food justice (1) education (1) community (1) race (1) cosmetics (1) collaboration (1) news coverage (1) institutional accountability (1) El Monte (3) public health (71) Oglala Sioux (3) suicide prevention (2) cervical cancer (1) Sam Kass (1) social math (1) community health (1) world water day (1) youth (1) strategic communication (1) community safety (1) Bill Cosby (1) suicide nets (1) Let's Move (1) San Francisco (3) community violence (1) apha (3) SSBs (1) Nickelodeon (1) tobacco tax (1) election 2016 (1) sexual assault (1) cannes lions festival (1) Donald Trump (2) product safety (1) childhood obesity (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) naacp (1) chronic disease (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) beverage industry (2) democracy (1) Sandy Hook (2) auto safety (1) Big Food (2) reproductive justice (1) personal responsibility (3) breastfeeding (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) diabetes prevention (1) news monitoring (1) prison phone calls (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Wendy Davis (1) snap (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) regulation (2) sandusky (2) authentic voices (1) physical activity (1) choice (1) white house (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Merck (1) health equity (10) Gardasil (1) Michelle Obama (1) target marketing (9) Penn State (3) political correctness (1) gun violence (1) prevention (1) food (1) summer camps (1) Telluride (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) news strategy (1) elephant triggers (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) values (1) SB-5 (1) ssb (1) structural racism (1) children's health (3) cancer research (1) safety (1) obesity prevention (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) paper tigers (1) American Beverage Association (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Texas (1) genital warts (1) public health data (1) california (1) Happy Meals (1) ACEs (2) soda (12) autism (1) SB 1000 (1) cigarette advertising (1) environmental health (1) obesity (10) diabetes (1) water security (1) privilege (1) Big Tobacco (3) food environment (1) Citizens United (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) healthy eating (1) HPV vaccine (1) Aurora (1) news (2) government intrusion (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) junk food (2) advocacy (3) health care (1) racism (1) childhood trauma (3) filibuster (1) suicide barrier (2) community organizing (1) equity (3) tobacco industry (2) prison system (1) Proposition 47 (1) Catholic church (1) Rachel Grana (1) water (1) indoor smoking ban (1) food access (1) paula deen (1) sanitation (1) new year's resolutions (1) Amanda Fallin (1) FCC (1) media bites (1) Colorado (1) seat belt laws (1) media advocacy (23) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) media (7) violence (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) Bloomberg (3) weight of the nation (1) food industry (4) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Tea Party (1) george lakoff (1) public health policy (2) Proposition 29 (1) news analysis (3) sports drinks (1) abortion (1) built environment (2) front groups (1) social change (1) Connecticut shooting (1) stigma (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Chile (1) food marketing (5) social justice (2) child sexual abuse (5) measure N (2) Richmond (5) liana winett (1) default frame (1) inequities (1) cancer prevention (1) mental health (2) SB 402 (1) gender (1) Black Lives Matter (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) junk food marketing (4) vaccines (1) communication strategy (1) tobacco (5) McDonald's (1) soda industry (4) women's health (2) alcohol (5) sexual violence (2) media analysis (6) cap the tap (1) childhood adversity (1) sexism (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) PepsiCo (1) Measure O (1) food swamps (1) nanny state (2) Marion Nestle (1) communication (2) nonprofit communications (1) violence prevention (8) food deserts (1) soda warning labels (1) Newtown (1) soda tax (11) social media (2) Joe Paterno (1) Big Soda (2) digital marketing (3) online marketing (1) Berkeley (2) gun control (2) campaign finance (1) Whiteclay (4) soda taxes (2) sugary drinks (10) journalism (1) sexual health (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: