How personal responsibility arguments help industries avoid regulation: Lessons from Big Tobacco and Big Food

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Tobacco control shines as a beacon of success in public health -- one that has informed advocates from many fields in their efforts to protect the public from harmful products. But just as advocates have learned from tobacco control, major industries have learned from the tobacco industry itself. The food and beverage industry's opposition to recent regulatory efforts, for example, has gotten a lot of attention for resembling the counter-regulatory "playbook" established by the tobacco industry to fight tobacco control policies.

What does this playbook look like and how do Big Food and Big Tobacco's tactics compare? At this year's meeting of the American Public Health Association, we'll dig into these questions and share findings from a content analysis we did of media coverage of both industries.

We started by exploring media coverage of the tobacco industry from 1966 to 1991. We also analyzed news coverage of the food and beverage industry from 2000 to 2011, when obesity emerged as a public health concern. We found that both Big Tobacco and Big Food have shifted responsibility away from themselves and their harmful products by drawing on the deeply held American value of individual responsibility. However, their strategies for doing so differ. Unlike tobacco companies, which placed blame for smoking-related diseases explicitly on consumers, food and beverage representatives primarily have used the news to deflect responsibility by creating costly "corporate social responsibility" campaigns and claiming to be "part of the solution" to nutrition-related diseases.

Our work offers advocates from both tobacco control and obesity prevention a more complete understanding of how two industries use the news to forestall regulation across shifting political landscapes. In addition, our analysis suggests that as the food and beverage industry uses the media to bolster its image, public health advocates must focus their efforts on undermining these self-promoting arguments to change the public's perception not only about harmful foods and beverages themselves, but also about the companies that produce and market them.

Please join us at session 43810 (Getting the message across: Manipulation or education?) on Tuesday, Nov. 5 at 4:30 p.m. to learn more!


gatorade bolt game (1) campaign finance (1) racism (1) online marketing (1) HPV vaccine (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) community violence (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Michelle Obama (1) Wendy Davis (1) auto safety (1) healthy eating (1) breastfeeding (3) Colorado (1) tobacco (5) gun control (2) cosmetics (1) cap the tap (1) tobacco control (2) Berkeley (2) sports drinks (1) summer camps (1) Catholic church (1) SB 402 (1) social media (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Bill Cosby (1) soda warning labels (1) Tea Party (1) Citizens United (1) strategic communication (1) Telluride (1) framing (14) community health (1) water (1) Gardasil (1) election 2016 (1) Chile (1) language (6) marketing (1) media (7) institutional accountability (1) news analysis (3) beverage industry (2) water security (1) children's health (3) health equity (10) food environment (1) community organizing (1) george lakoff (1) political correctness (1) sexual health (1) inequities (1) Coca-Cola (3) corporate social responsibility (1) El Monte (3) Black Lives Matter (1) physical activity (1) Merck (1) childhood obesity (1) paula deen (1) junk food marketing (4) adverse childhood experiences (3) messaging (3) Proposition 29 (1) Newtown (1) childhood trauma (3) Bloomberg (3) women's health (2) world water day (1) SB 1000 (1) abortion (1) Big Tobacco (3) food and beverage marketing (3) race (1) social change (1) Big Soda (2) emergency contraception (1) news monitoring (1) measure N (2) San Francisco (3) education (1) ACEs (2) media analysis (6) Connecticut shooting (1) Measure O (1) Richmond (5) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) advocacy (3) Marion Nestle (1) soda tax (11) Oglala Sioux (3) white house (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) sandusky (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) PepsiCo (1) cigarette advertising (1) front groups (1) california (1) Joe Paterno (1) childhood adversity (1) Sam Kass (1) American Beverage Association (1) Happy Meals (1) social math (1) news (2) product safety (1) cancer research (1) reproductive justice (1) Nickelodeon (1) naacp (1) health care (1) gender (1) structural racism (1) genital warts (1) food marketing (5) Sandy Hook (2) personal responsibility (3) cervical cancer (1) default frame (1) Texas (1) gun violence (1) Aurora (1) ssb (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Amanda Fallin (1) journalism (1) autism (1) sugary drinks (10) snap (1) public health (71) Whiteclay (4) Let's Move (1) SB-5 (1) violence prevention (8) Golden Gate Bridge (2) nanny state (2) Proposition 47 (1) social justice (2) food swamps (1) prison phone calls (1) public health policy (2) apha (3) cannes lions festival (1) junk food (2) Twitter (1) suicide nets (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) sexual assault (1) FCC (1) soda taxes (2) chronic disease (2) diabetes (1) filibuster (1) media advocacy (23) authentic voices (1) food (1) community (1) built environment (2) democracy (1) Penn State (3) government intrusion (1) collaboration (1) industry appeals to choice (1) paper tigers (1) news strategy (1) tobacco tax (1) equity (3) digital marketing (3) community safety (1) prevention (1) vaccines (1) liana winett (1) violence (2) Rachel Grana (1) public health data (1) obesity (10) Oakland Unified School District (1) tobacco industry (2) food industry (4) sexual violence (2) communication (2) communication strategy (1) diabetes prevention (1) alcohol (5) privilege (1) media bites (1) soda industry (4) Dora the Explorer (1) beauty products (1) target marketing (9) seat belt laws (1) child sexual abuse (5) junk food marketing to kids (2) mental health (2) weight of the nation (1) nonprofit communications (1) prison system (1) suicide barrier (2) news coverage (1) elephant triggers (1) food access (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) values (1) McDonald's (1) SSBs (1) environmental health (1) suicide prevention (2) new year's resolutions (1) sexism (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) regulation (2) youth (1) Big Food (2) soda (12) stigma (1) food deserts (1) cancer prevention (1) obesity prevention (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) choice (1) Donald Trump (2) sanitation (1) food justice (1) safety (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) indoor smoking ban (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: